What it means to face reality

Saul Alinsky would have tweeted “Of Means and Ends.” If not someone else posthumously. Quick tweetables: “The means-and-ends moralists or non-doers always wind up on their ends without any means,” “Men must change with the times or die,” “He who fears corruption fears life.”

I have wondered before that if I were a citizen of Nazi Germany, a good Protestant from an upstanding family, would I protect state targets? Ferry people across borders? Position myself, or my family, to be thrown in a concentration camp? If Jewish people were not dragged out of their homes onto my street, right outside of my window, taken away in boxcars out of sight and out of mind, or ghettoed behind walls within my city, what would I actually do? What would be in my power to do?

Alinsky’s piece was convicting, if disagreeable. I felt convicted, because I doubt any desire I have to be on the “good side” of history is strong enough to take whatever means necessary to achieve a particular desired ends. It takes a whole lot more than that.

“I would rather lose than corrupt my principles.” Perhaps I would state this phrase that Alinsky curled his lip at. I’m competitive, but not that much. Alinsky used arguments from times of war, maybe he saw himself as in a war. Maybe he was right. Even the means to peace requires tremendous sacrifice, just like war. I don’t know if I’ve truly sacrificed.

It’s hard to admit this, but I feel I have not lived enough reality. The Minkler article also talked about competition, the winning and losing, from the vantage point of similar organizations competing for grant funding. That’s a hard reality, and I have yet to experience it, and perhaps will. Another reality is quoted from Gail Siler-Wells: “Behind the euphemisms of participation and empowerment lay the realities of power, control and ownership.” Those three words can be quite corrupting, but without those three things, how effective can one be in achieving any kind of change?

If I’m serious about working in Detroit, for reasons I myself am a little unclear about, I will need to face a lot more reality and become well-verse in “power, control and ownership” and many “means and ends.” That’s daunting, but I have to remind myself that I’m here in Michigan willingly, and it’s not all on me to do some kind of exceptional, city-changing work. There’s a “we” of people taking small steps forward, and I can find my small ways to partner with that. Right now, it’s a dream, but maybe one day, it will become a reality.

 

 

 

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “What it means to face reality

  1. Gabby,

    I wanted to share some personal experience I’ve had with competing for funding. Over last summer I was an intern at Grand Rapids Pride Center. My supervisor would often lament over having to compete for funding a support with neighboring LGBTQ orgs. This competition made it very hard to collaborate with those orgs.

    If we could somehow put less emphasis on competition and more on collaboration, there might be less tension between neighboring orgs.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I so agree, Shay. I was talking to a friend of mine who works at a nonprofit, and she was saying the same thing. If we could only collaborate more and compete less as nonprofits, we could probably help a lot more people.

      Like

  2. Gabby, really interesting piece. Thanks for sharing! One quote that stuck out to me was “Even the means to peace requires tremendous sacrifice, just like war. I don’t know if I’ve truly sacrificed.” I wanted to know: assuming you will continue working as a social work practitioner, how do you foresee yourself sacrificing in the future? Do you believe sacrificing is necessary/essential for gaining the means to peace?

    I also really liked you stating “there’s a ‘we’ of people taking small steps forward. I think keeping in mind the collective and not just the individual is important when promoting social change.

    Like

  3. Hi Gabby,

    I thought you made great points about what you would lose to fight to reach the means. I feel like as social workers, we have to accept that we won’t win all battles, and we won’t change the world. Although sounds pessimistic, if we go through our careers with the mentality that we are going to change and help every cause, we will be left extremely exhausted and defeated. We need to strategically pick and chose our battles so that we do have a seat at the “powerful” table.

    In regards to Shay’s comment about competiton, this is extremely interesting to point out. Why is it that we have to compete for funding rather than collaborating? At my field placement, we re-grant to other organizations simlar to theirs and learning about re-granting is like capacity building and collaborating among other organizations. I don’t know why this is a new thing to me, and I can think of a few ways such as this example we can collaborate instead of compete.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s